$$Shiver or Swelter$$?

Okay I can't help myself. Time magazine has an article linking the recent snow storms to global warming. White Christmas is now an ominous treat to the continuance of civilization. I never mean to offend anyone but this is hilarious. Throughout history (oh no does this mean studying the actual facts?) our climate has phases of hotter and colder. More scientists clearly recognize this than the few climate alarmists who use fear to line their pockets. Let's be objective in our study of history and climate.

Personally I believe this is mostly alarmist and money making efforts for some research scientists who need government money to keep their jobs and a basis for very creative potential tax increases. My air space needs to be taxed because I am using it to spread nasty CO2. Humans are the big bad culprits leaving nasty footprints. C'mon. We create a tiny amount of CO2 but try keeping a rainforest or any plants without CO2. If anyone honestly studies the history of weather and climate change it is not hard to see that it always cycles. We are sooo gullible to the media! Besides I can't get afraid of global warming because I haven't yet gotten past the enormous fears generated not many decades ago that we were rapidly transitioning into an ice age. I don't like being cold so I'm still afraid of that!

As 2010 draws to a close, do you remember hearing any good news from the mainstream media about climate? Like maybe a headline proclaiming "Record Low 2009 and 2010 Cyclonic Activity Reported: Global Warming Theorists Perplexed"? Or "NASA Studies Report Oceans Entering New Cooling Phase: Alarmists Fear Climate Science Budgets in Peril"? Or even anything bad that isn't blamed on anthropogenic (man-made) global warming...Hot Sensations Vs. Cold Facts, December 27, 2010

Forbes.com  The media owe us better coverage on the climate than alarmism